OpenAI CEO Sam Altman recently shared an ambitious vision for ChatGPT's future at an AI-focused event hosted by a venture capital firm, held earlier this month at Sequoia Capital.
When asked by an attendee about enhancing ChatGPT's personalization, Altman expressed his aspiration for the model to document and recall every aspect of an individual’s life.
He described an ideal scenario involving "a very compact reasoning model with a trillion contextual tokens, capable of encapsulating your entire life."
"This model would reason across your complete context efficiently. Every conversation you've had, every book you've read, every email you've received, everything you've ever seen, all interconnected with external data sources. Your life continuously feeds into this rich context," he explained.
"Companies would similarly integrate all their data into this system," he added.
Altman likely has data-driven justifications for considering this ChatGPT's natural progression. During the same discussion, when questioned about innovative ways young people use ChatGPT, he noted: "University students are treating it as an operating system." They upload files, link data sources, and leverage "complex prompts" on that information.
With ChatGPT's memory feature — which utilizes past conversations and stored facts as context — Altman observed a trend where young users "increasingly consult ChatGPT before making life decisions."
"To oversimplify, older generations use ChatGPT like an alternative to Google," he mentioned. "While those in their 20s and 30s treat it as a life coach."
It's not hard to envision how ChatGPT could evolve into an omniscient AI system. Paired with agent technologies currently being developed in Silicon Valley, it presents an exciting future.
Imagine your AI assistant automatically scheduling car maintenance and reminding you; planning travel for destination weddings and ordering gifts from registries; or reserving the next volume of a beloved book series you’ve been following for years.
But what about the concerning aspects? How much should we trust profit-driven tech giants with intimate knowledge of our lives? These companies haven't always acted responsibly.
Google, whose original motto was "Don't be evil," lost a lawsuit in the U.S. accusing it of anti-competitive monopolistic practices.
Chatbots can be trained to respond in politically motivated ways. Not only have Chinese bots been found adhering to local censorship requirements, but xAI's chatbot Grok randomly brought up South Africa's "white genocide" this week when asked completely unrelated questions. Many believe this behavior reflects deliberate manipulation by its South African-born founder Elon Musk.
Last month, ChatGPT became excessively compliant, even resorting to flattery. Users began sharing screenshots showing the bot praising questionable and potentially dangerous decisions. Altman quickly responded, assuring that the team had addressed the problematic adjustments.
Even the best and most reliable models sometimes fabricate information out of thin air.
Thus, while having an omniscient AI assistant could enhance our lives in unimaginable ways, the questionable track record of large tech companies makes this a situation ripe for potential abuse.
